Sunday, November 30, 2008


LA Weekly:
Criticism of No on 8 = 'Horizontal Violence'


The much-deserved troubles for the gay leadership circle that brought about the Prop 8 blunder are not cooling off, and a fantastic new blog posting from the LA Weekly's Patrick Range McDonald brings needed attention to the machinations of an A-list lesbian, hell-bent on preserving the shredded reputation of Lorri Jean.

From the LA Weekly:

If you read Osborn's piece, it makes you wonder why Rose Greene, a member of the board of directors at the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center, continues to demand that critics of the campaign cease and desist, and instead focus on the future. Greene, who must work closely with L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center CEO and "No on 8" executive committee member Lorri Jean, is now essentially telling Osborn that she, too, should shut up.

Greene popped up on the "No on 8" apologists circuit last week, when she wrote a comment to a post I wrote titled "No on 8" Leadership on the Hot Seat. At the time, Greene failed to disclose her working relationship with the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center, so I wrote my own comment to fill in the public.

Greene wrote another comment on the blog of Michael Petrelis, who's been sharply critical of Lorri Jean and other "No on 8" leaders. This time, Greene wrote about her affiliation with the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center and actually described any criticisms of the "No on 8" campaign as "horizontal violence."

This intrigue is not some petty thing. It shows, at the very least, that certain A-list gays and lesbians appear to be in deep denial about the role of the "No on 8" campaign in its own defeat, which is also a defeat for every gay and lesbian in California and across the United States ...

Greene's active role in diverting attention away from getting to the bottom of the Proposition 8 loss, which could prevent future debacles, may also show how "No on 8" leaders and their friends in the gay establishment want to shield themselves from criticism, and the political fall out that may come with it.

Once again, it makes a thinking person wonder: Are "No on 8" leaders undertaking some kind of cover up? If so, why? In the coming weeks, those questions may or may not be answered--it depends if more people like Osborn, young gays and lesbians, and others continue to call for accountability on the part of the "No on 8" campaign.

It's been a month since Prop 8 went down like a size-queen hitting her knees for big meat, and we've yet to see a single town hall forum in either southern or northern California with the A-list gays who ran the No on 8 campaign, that allowed the community to vent pent up anger at the leaders who betrayed us.

Since their plans crashed so horribly on November 4, the self-appointed control queens of the CA movement haven't made themselves to face the wrath of the community they purport to be leading.

Instead of facing their critics, the likes of Lorri Jean, Kate Kendell and Geoff Kors, who really should start a firm - Dewey, Cheatam and Howe - they're now unleashing other A-list professionals to attempt a tamping down of the questions and anger.

Just like the massive failure of this A-list crew to beat Prop 8, they cannot stop the accountability, and hopeful head-rolling, that is coming.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

In an effort to get my name attached to the "A-list Lesbian" honor roll I have to comment on your posting. Your rant is so self righteous and hostile towards people who made a very public effort to defeat Prop 8, that I am moved to ask: Where were you? Did you contribute time, money or your considerable venomous vocabulary to assist in the effort to win an uphill battle? Did it occur to you to direct your energy toward those who actually voted against our civil rights?
Let me be clear that I am on the board of the LAGLC and proud of the work that we do. I am also proud to work with Lorri and am amazed at the amount of time and energy that she devoted to this campaign. I agree with Rose Greene's assessment that this language represents horizontal violence. After a lifetime (62 years) of being out, active and devoted to my community your words stir an anger in my gut. I have learned to trust my gut.
"Cover-up?" Give me a break! To what end?
"Head rolling?" Can you "roll a head" from a volunteer job?
"Massive A-list campaign?" Did anybody else volunteer for the job? What sort of Hollywood blather is this?
After our defeat, I took solace in the unity and kindness of our community and was thankful, once again, to be part of it.
Your attitude does not make me proud. I am unable to see how one word of your angry, accusatory tirade brings us one step closer to the equality we seek. The obvious pleasure you took in writing this slander makes me question what your motives really are. Is this the "cover-up?" Thanks Michael for revealing a truly ugly side of defeat. How about trying to be oart of the solution?
Marki J Knox