tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5141703.post2168265263706567097..comments2024-02-21T17:03:05.861-08:00Comments on Petrelis Files: Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08359712473083091475noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5141703.post-18518106725986084002011-01-11T23:49:11.758-08:002011-01-11T23:49:11.758-08:00Michael-
I apologize for posting this here, but I ...Michael-<br />I apologize for posting this here, but I didn't know where else to put it. I wanted you to see this unbelievable web posting and video from Stop8.org. <br /><br />http://stop8.org/<br />(First item on the page, or scroll down for the video)<br /><br />Stop8 reports that EQCA has apparently decided on its own that there will be no repeal effort. The EQCA website is still telling the public that there should be a ballot effort in 2012, but the Managing Director Jim Carroll told Stop8 that it is not even on his radar screen.<br /><br />The Stop8 spokesman tries to justify not going ahead with repeal in 2012. But he bases that conclusion on a ridiculous argument that the opposition has kept its "campaign structure in place". <br /><br />He also thinks that that the Prop 8 "campaign structure" has been maintained for decades - going back to Prop 22 in 2000 or to the "1980s" when he erroneously believes there was a ballot fight on marriage in Hawaii. <br /><br />This is wrong on so many levels, it would take several pages to lay it all out. It is unclear whether this bizarre and nearly incoherent rationale came from Stop8 itself, or whether EQCA suggested it. <br /><br />BTW, I agree that we should not go to the ballot in 2012, b/c the odds are good that we will win in court. But how can EQCA make that decision in secret and unilaterally? I hope you will use your impressive muckraking talents and find out what the real story is here.<br />-David<br /><br />BTW, since this really wasn't a comment on the post, feel free to post it or not post it as you see fit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com